Mark,

Amateurism? What do you call sending your message to the whole list when it
was addressed to 4 people?

Hypocritical.

BTW, excuse me for MY waste of bandwidth. Yahoo can handle it considering
the graphics crap they tag to each post and you can handle it by kill
filtering anything with my name on it. Pretty simple, ehh rookie?



Glenn
of the bandwidth waster





----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark S. Fitton"
To:
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 8:50 PM
Subject: [LbNA] Re: (wasRe: new boxes)


> To AD, Glenn, John, and BB:
>
> When replying to Joe's post, it isn't necessary to include every single
> word that he wrote for his clues. The waste of bandwidth speaks of an
> amateurism I know not to exist in a couple of you "veterans".
>
> If you must make smart ass remarks to people, just don't include the
entire
> text of the original. Go ahead, fire away at me. I can take it.
>
>
> Mark
> of the 4-hearted Fittons
>
>

>>Mark,

Amateurism? What do you call sending your message to the whole list when it
was addressed to 4 people?<<

Let me spell it out for you.

I receive this list in digest form. The four of you are only the latest on
this list to make that error. There are some who have included the entire
digest (!) in their response.

I felt that replying to you four on the list would cause a lot more people
than you four to look at how they respond to e-mail lists and digests.

Glenn, if you had even a slight bit of fairness and understanding of others
in your seemingly eternally mean bones, you would understand that not
everyone has enough time at work to waste their companies resources and T1
connections surfing the Internet. I'm not suggesting you do, but please
remember that some of us still connect at 28.8 or 33.6 or if we're real
lucky at 36.2.

Next time, when someone points out that you made a basic e-mail etiquette
mistake, don't attack them. Learn from your mistake. Being mean is easy.
Attacking my signature by mimicking it was childish, by the way.


Mark
of the 4-hearted Fittons

Why do you keep wasting your companies bandwidth and T1 connection replying
via the list Mark?

Sorry group, I'll shut up.

Glenn


----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark S. Fitton"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 1:29 PM
Subject: [LbNA] Re: (wasRe: new boxes)


> >>Mark,
>
> Amateurism? What do you call sending your message to the whole list when
it
> was addressed to 4 people?<<
>
> Let me spell it out for you.
>
> I receive this list in digest form. The four of you are only the latest on
> this list to make that error. There are some who have included the entire
> digest (!) in their response.
>
> I felt that replying to you four on the list would cause a lot more people
> than you four to look at how they respond to e-mail lists and digests.
>
> Glenn, if you had even a slight bit of fairness and understanding of
others
> in your seemingly eternally mean bones, you would understand that not
> everyone has enough time at work to waste their companies resources and T1
> connections surfing the Internet. I'm not suggesting you do, but please
> remember that some of us still connect at 28.8 or 33.6 or if we're real
> lucky at 36.2.
>
> Next time, when someone points out that you made a basic e-mail etiquette
> mistake, don't attack them. Learn from your mistake. Being mean is easy.
> Attacking my signature by mimicking it was childish, by the way.
>
>
> Mark
> of the 4-hearted Fittons
>
>